This is an important and timely discussion of informed consent with a specific girl’s rights lens! the concept of ‘duty of care’ is particularly useful, shifting the burden of responsibility back to the institutional entity rather than the individual, which is ultimately responsible for how and if data about vulnerable constituencies is used.
This post is co-authored by Emily Tomkys, Oxfam GB; Danna Ingleton, Amnesty International; and me (Linda Raftree, Independent)
At the MERL Tech conference in DC this month, we ran a breakout session on rethinking consent in the digital age. Most INGOs have not updated their consent forms and policies for many years, yet the growing use of technology in our work, for many different purposes, raises many questions and insecurities that are difficult to address. Our old ways of requesting and managing consent need to be modernized to meet the new realities of digital data and the changing nature of data. Is informed consent even possible when data is digital and/or opened? Do we have any way of controlling what happens with that data once it is digital? How often are organizations violating national and global data privacy laws? Can technology be part of the answer?
Let’s take a moment…
View original post 1,065 more words